![]() You just can't have everything on the same timeline. Sequences are necessary on big and complicated projects. Built in sequences in the same instance is the solution, like in Premiere Pro. Two instances obviously takes to much resources to manage. In order to succeed I always need to close the open project and then open another Vegas instance and after a few crashes until finally two instances agree to stay opened - then projects can be opened on both and events can be copied and pasted.īut this is a showstopper process. Working on a project and opening another instance of Vegas crashes my Vegas 99% of the time. The nest project thing and having two instances of Vegas open doesn't cut it for me. The great thing about Vegas is that it lets you do this and have multiple instances of the program open because you really don't wantīuilt in sequences are badly needed for me. Veg file onto a new timline and it will be nested. You can already Nest sequences and have been able to since well before Magix took over. Nest sequences or multiple timelines.I wish that vegas will be more stable and userfriendly. Track groups are also helpful but more in a vertical sense than horizontally if you get my meaning. Nested projects are OK but obviously limited. It is very challenging to deal with large quantities of media. Maybe there is some other bottleneck I don't know about. I have 24 GB of RAM though, whoch should be quite good.I guess. ![]() It seems the low memory resources may be a part of the problem. You have to investigate, what is the issue that it is not working for you (plug-ins, missing media, low HW resources etc.) But it would be nice to have timeline tabs with sub-sequences edits as DaVinci Resolve has in one instance. Working with a nested project I do on daily basis with opened two or three instances of Vegas every time. But it doesn't fill the need of tabbed sequences. That is truly a good help when the tracks are numbering over the 20-ies. If you need extra help, then please go to our community forum and connect with the incredible experience of the television industry. Here you will find the latest software updates, support notes, instruction manuals and all kinds of helpful information. Makes big and complicated projects overlookable. Welcome to the Blackmagic Design support center. Hope someone did put his hands on both and will be able to answer.Have you ever used/tried the Track Group feature? With this feature you can shrink several (selected) tracks into ONE track. Unfortunately, here in Italy I can’t find a shop where to try them so, let me ask a couple of questions here:ġ – Do you really use all of those buttons on the Pro? With your “spare” hand? Isn’t it awkward?Ģ – Does the two devices have the same stability or one is far better than the other?ģ – How big (small) the two things are? I couldn’t find the size specifications.Ĥ – Is the quality of the build the same for the two? It’s not a problem of money but of functionality and of usability. ![]() I had a look at Contour products and I’m wondering if for me it will be enough the Express or if would be better to get the Pro v2. Just added it back for use in DaVinci Resolve, and found it to be great in. Now I would like to get a shuttle to make the jogging/scrubbing easier (so I hope).Īs I read here around, being a righty I will probably place the shuttle on the left of my kb. I had one 12 years ago and got rid of it after getting a Euphonix Artist Control. ![]() Drivers are available for Max OS X 10.8 (Mountain Lion) and Windows 8 (32 and 64 bit). Spring-loaded and rubberized shuttle knob. Super smooth jog knob for frame by frame navigation and control - ShuttlePRO V.2 features new alloy knob for professional feel. I usually do multicam editing on a sub par PC with not much fluidity in playback and I often have to manually search for the actual frame where to place a cam marker. Fifteen (15) fully programmable buttons on ShuttlePRO V.2. I’m just an amateur, not a pro and I don’t do video editing every day.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |